Search
Recent Posts
- Braverman must resign
- Asset-liability mismatching should have no place in banking
- Parents stretching the finances to finance private schooling
- No need to be alarmed, says Bank of England; so why I suddenly alarmed?
- Blue Blood, Cazenove in the Age of Global Banking
- It was 30 years ago today
- If Gondolas Could Talk
- Colditz: Prisoners of the Castle
- The issue of WHT reclamation: the view from Northern Trust
Become a Fan
May 2023
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Cressida Dick MUST resign: Part Two
Read the BBC report on the women's demonstration yesterday evening, and ask yourself if, should this be a wholly accurate version of events, the police action is remotely appropriate and proportionate: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56389824
In order to prevent a risk of spreading Covid-19, they had to handcuff and arrest people, who were protesting about the abduction and murder of a woman by a practising member of that force.
Policing by consent? Don't make me laugh. This completes the UK's journey over the past 12 months into being a dystopian totalitarian police state. Qualitatively speaking, is there any difference between what the Met are doing and what the police in Burma are doing?
I think not.
Cressida Dick MUST resign, followed swiftly by the home secretary.
Posted at 12:43 PM in News & Comment | Permalink