Search
Recent Posts
- Braverman must resign
- Asset-liability mismatching should have no place in banking
- Parents stretching the finances to finance private schooling
- No need to be alarmed, says Bank of England; so why I suddenly alarmed?
- Blue Blood, Cazenove in the Age of Global Banking
- It was 30 years ago today
- If Gondolas Could Talk
- Colditz: Prisoners of the Castle
- The issue of WHT reclamation: the view from Northern Trust
Become a Fan
May 2023
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Bradley Walsh: Why?
Would someone please explain to me why Bradley Walsh is everywhere on telly? From sub-standard game shows to sub-standard travel shows to sub-standard Doctor Who.
Now, I learn, he is to be Pop Larkin in what I fully expect to be a sub-standard iteration of a rehashing of The Darling Buds of May.
Why?
Posted at 01:48 PM in News & Comment | Permalink